503.4 Lesson - prohibitivelyHigh
Screen: prohibitivelyHigh
Headline: Bitcoin transaction costs are prohibitively high
Reward: 3
Text: Another misconception about bitcoin is that its transaction costs are prohibitively high.
However, confirmed transactions on the main layer of bitcoin provide a level of finality that is unmatched in the traditional financial system. While it is true that transaction fees may occasionally spike due to the limited capacity of each block, the bitcoin network remains an efficient and reliable settlement layer for high-value transactions.
In fact, according to Saifedean Ammous, "between October 2010 and July 2021, the average daily transaction fees came up to around 0.02% of the value of the transactions."
In addition, smaller transactions, including microtransactions, are often migrated to secondary layers such as lightning, liquid, or federated side-chains where fees are significantly lower than those offered by retail banks.
=================================================================
QUIZ
Question: What is the main reason that transaction fees on the main layer of bitcoin remain relatively low compared to traditional financial systems?
Answer: The efficiency and reliability of the bitcoin network as a settlement layer
Feedback: Congratulations, you've hit the nail on the head! The efficiency and reliability of the bitcoin network certainly play a role in keeping transaction fees low. Did you know that the bitcoin network can process up to 7 transactions per second, making it faster than some traditional payment systems
Correct: true
Answer: The use of secondary layers such as lightning, liquid, or federated side-chains for smaller transactions
Feedback: Nice try, but it looks like you're missing a key piece of information. Try again
Correct: false
Answer: The fact that bitcoin is still a relatively new technology and has not yet reached its full potential
Feedback: Sorry, but being a newer technology does not necessarily equate to lower transaction fees. Better luck next time!
Correct: false
Last updated